Reviewer Guidelines

To elevate the caliber of our journal publications, we extend a gracious invitation to esteemed experts to partake in the role of reviewers for the MIPA Insight Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Mathematics. Your invaluable support and contributions are instrumental in ensuring the publication of manuscripts of exceptional quality and high standards.

Reviewer Qualifications:

Potential reviewers must hold a Master's or Doctoral degree.
Their expertise should align with the field of science and mathematics education.
Experience as a proficient reviewer for scientific journals is highly desirable.
Publication of article(s) in internationally reputable journals with citations is a prerequisite.

Review Guidelines:

During the evaluation process, reviewers are encouraged to focus on the following criteria:

Presentation:
- Does the manuscript present a coherent and compelling argument?
- Are the ideas articulated in a clear and concise manner?

Writing:
- Does the title accurately reflect the manuscript's content?
- Is the writing style succinct and easily comprehensible?

Length:
- Which sections of the manuscript require elaboration, reduction, summarization, or merging?

Title:
- Does the title succinctly, clearly, and attractively represent the manuscript's content?

Abstract:
- Does the abstract cover the essential elements, including research background, objective, method, findings, and contributions/implications?

Introduction:
- The background should highlight a research gap.
- The literature review should incorporate relevant theories.
- Emphasize the originality of the work.
- Clearly state the study's objectives and hypothesis development if using a quantitative method.

Method:
- Thoroughly describe all research procedures.
- Identify study variables, research subjects, and research instruments.
- Elaborate on data analysis techniques.
- Provide sufficient information for other researchers to replicate the study.

Result:
- Use tables and figures to present processed data.
- Ensure results address the research question and/or hypotheses.

Discussion:
- Analyze results in relation to existing literature.
- Describe the implications of the research.
- Address the study's strengths and limitations.

Conclusion:
- Summarize the main conclusions effectively.
- Present findings as a synthesis of results and discussions.
- Highlight new findings contributing to science and mathematics education development.

Your commitment to upholding these rigorous standards plays a pivotal role in maintaining the excellence of the MIPA Insight Journal. We appreciate your dedication to the advancement of scholarly discourse in our multidisciplinary field.