Peer Review Process
The MIPA Insight Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Mathematics adheres to a rigorous peer review process. Each submitted article undergoes a meticulous closed double-blind review conducted by a minimum of two esteemed reviewers. Their discerning evaluations serve as the basis for the editor (or editorial board) to make informed decisions regarding publication – whether to accept, accept with revisions, or reject. Authors are expected to diligently address the reviewers' comments and enhance their submissions accordingly. Following the implementation of suggested improvements, authors are required to resubmit the revised article for further evaluation. In order to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity, all submissions to the MIPA Insight Journal undergo scrutiny using plagiarism detection software. The final adjudication on manuscripts rests with the discernment of the Editor in Chief, ensuring a judicious and refined selection process.