Peer Review Process

All submissions to InnovaPed: Journal of Innovative Pedagogies in Elementary Education undergo a rigorous closed double-blind review process. This means that both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the review process, ensuring an unbiased and objective evaluation.

After an initial editorial screening for relevance and quality, manuscripts are assigned to two or more independent reviewers with expertise in the subject area. The reviewers assess the manuscript based on its originality, methodological rigor, significance, and contribution to the field of elementary education.

The editorial team makes the final decision on whether the manuscript is accepted, requires revisions, or is rejected, based on the reviewers' recommendations. The authors are provided with constructive feedback to improve their work, even if it is not accepted for publication.

InnovaPed is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and transparency in the peer review process.