Reviewer Guidelines

To enhance the caliber of our journal publications, we warmly invite distinguished experts to serve as reviewers for Kabelo: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. Your essential contributions are crucial to ensuring the publication of high-quality manuscripts.

Reviewer Qualifications:

  • Hold a Master's or Doctoral degree.
  • Preferably have prior experience as a reviewer for scientific journals.
  • Have published articles in internationally recognized journals with citations.

Review Guidelines: Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

Presentation:

  • Does the manuscript present a logical and persuasive argument?
  • Are the ideas clearly and concisely expressed?

Writing:

  • Does the title accurately reflect the content of the manuscript?
  • Is the writing style clear and easy to understand?

Length:

  • Which sections of the manuscript need more detail, reduction, summarization, or merging?

Title:

  • Does the title clearly, concisely, and attractively represent the content of the manuscript?

Abstract:

  • Does the abstract include essential elements such as the research background, objectives, methods, findings, and contributions/implications?

Introduction:

  • Does the background highlight a research gap?
  • Does the literature review incorporate relevant theories?
  • Is the originality of the work emphasized?
  • Are the study's objectives and hypothesis development clearly stated, if applicable?

Method:

  • Are all research procedures thoroughly described?
  • Are study variables, research subjects, and research instruments identified?
  • Are data analysis techniques elaborated upon?
  • Is there sufficient information for other researchers to replicate the study?

Results:

  • Are tables and figures used to present processed data?
  • Do the results address the research question and/or hypotheses?

Discussion:

  • Are the results analyzed in relation to existing literature?
  • Are the implications of the research described?
  • Are the study's strengths and limitations addressed?

Conclusion:

  • Are the main conclusions effectively summarized?
  • Are findings presented as a synthesis of results and discussions?
  • Are new findings that contribute to the development of science and mathematics education highlighted?

Your adherence to these rigorous standards is essential in maintaining the excellence of Kabelo: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. We greatly appreciate your commitment to advancing scholarly discourse in our multidisciplinary field.