Reviewer Guidelines

As a reviewer for EduAI: Journal of AI in Educational Practices, your role is crucial in ensuring the quality and integrity of the journal's published research. Please follow the guidelines below when reviewing manuscripts.

1. Presentation

  • The manuscript should be well-organized and clearly structured.
  • Figures and tables should be relevant, clearly labeled, and properly referenced in the text.
  • Ensure that any supplementary materials are appropriately included and referenced.

2. Writing

  • The writing should be clear, concise, and free of jargon.
  • Authors should maintain a formal academic tone and avoid colloquialisms.
  • Check for grammatical and typographical errors, ensuring that the manuscript adheres to the journal’s writing style.

3. Length

  • Review the manuscript for adherence to the journal's word limit (typically around 6,000–8,000 words, including references and figures).
  • Ensure that each section is appropriately detailed without being overly verbose.

4. Title

  • The title should accurately reflect the content and main findings of the study.
  • It should be concise yet informative, ideally no longer than 15 words.

5. Abstract

  • The abstract should summarize the key elements of the study, including the purpose, methodology, results, and conclusions.
  • It should be between 150-250 words and be self-contained, not referring to figures, tables, or citations.

6. Introduction

  • The introduction should provide a clear context for the study, outlining the research problem and its significance.
  • It should review relevant literature to highlight gaps the current study addresses.
  • Clearly state the research objectives and/or hypotheses.

7. Method

  • The methodology section should provide sufficient detail to allow replication of the study.
  • Review whether the research design, participants, instruments, and procedures are clearly described and appropriate for the research question.
  • Assess the ethical considerations taken by the authors.

8. Results

  • Results should be presented logically, with appropriate use of figures and tables.
  • Check for clarity in the presentation of statistical analyses and ensure that findings are accurately reported.

9. Discussion

  • The discussion should interpret the results, relating them back to the research questions and existing literature.
  • Assess whether the authors acknowledge the limitations of their study and suggest areas for future research.

10. Conclusion

  • The conclusion should succinctly summarize the key findings and their implications for practice and future research.
  • Ensure that it does not introduce new information that was not discussed in the results or discussion sections.