Peer Review Process

The Community Research and Application Journal (CRAJ) maintains a rigorous peer review process. Each manuscript submitted undergoes a thorough, closed double-blind review by a minimum of two esteemed reviewers. Their detailed evaluations assist the editor or editorial board in deciding whether to accept, revise, or reject the manuscript. Authors are required to meticulously address the reviewers' comments and enhance their work accordingly. After revisions, the updated manuscript is resubmitted for additional review. To ensure academic integrity, all submissions to CRAJ are screened using plagiarism detection software. The Editor in Chief has the final say on manuscript decisions, guaranteeing a meticulous and high-quality selection process.