Reviewer Guidelines
As a reviewer for JUSI: Jurnal Studi Ilmiah, your feedback is essential in ensuring the quality of the manuscripts submitted. Please consider the following criteria when reviewing a manuscript:
1. Presentation
- Assess the overall presentation of the manuscript, including layout, formatting, and adherence to journal guidelines.
- Check for clarity and coherence in the organization of the text.
2. Writing
- Evaluate the clarity, conciseness, and style of the writing.
- Ensure that technical terms and concepts are defined and explained clearly for the intended audience.
3. Length
- Consider whether the manuscript is appropriately concise and does not exceed the recommended word limits for the journal.
4. Title
- Review the title for relevance, specificity, and ability to convey the main topic of the research.
- It should be engaging and accurately reflect the content of the manuscript.
5. Abstract
- The abstract should summarize the key objectives, methods, results, and conclusions of the study.
- Check that it is concise, informative, and does not exceed the word limit.
6. Introduction
- Assess whether the introduction provides sufficient background and context for the study.
- Ensure that the research question or hypothesis is clearly stated.
7. Method
- Evaluate the appropriateness and rigor of the methodology employed.
- Check for clarity in the description of methods, including sample selection, data collection, and analysis techniques.
8. Result
- Review the results for clarity and relevance.
- Ensure that findings are presented logically and supported by appropriate statistical analyses where applicable.
9. Discussion
- Assess whether the discussion adequately interprets the results and places them in the context of existing literature.
- Check for any potential biases and limitations acknowledged by the authors.
10. Conclusion
- Ensure that the conclusion summarizes the main findings and implications of the study.
- It should also suggest areas for future research if appropriate.