Reviewer Guidelines

1. Presentation

• Ensure that the manuscript is well-organized and adheres to the journal's formatting guidelines.
• Check for clarity in headings and subheadings to facilitate reader navigation.

2. Writing

• Evaluate the clarity, coherence, and overall quality of the writing.
• Look for proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
• Assess whether the language used is appropriate for the intended audience.

3. Length

• Ensure that the manuscript meets the journal’s specified word limit.
• Review whether each section is concise and relevant to the topic.

4. Title

• Assess if the title accurately reflects the content and focus of the manuscript.
• Ensure that the title is engaging and informative.

5. Abstract

• Evaluate the abstract for clarity and conciseness.
• Check if it summarizes the key aspects of the research, including the purpose, methodology, results, and conclusions.

6. Introduction

• Ensure that the introduction provides adequate background information and context.
• Check if the research problem is clearly stated and relevant to community service.
• Assess the objectives of the study and its significance.

7. Method

• Review the methodology for clarity and appropriateness.
• Ensure that the methods used are suitable for addressing the research question.
• Check if ethical considerations and approvals are mentioned where applicable.

8. Result

• Evaluate whether the results are clearly presented and supported by data.
• Ensure that tables, figures, and graphs are used effectively and are appropriately labeled.

9. Discussion

• Assess if the discussion interprets the results in relation to the research question and existing literature.
• Ensure that implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed.

10. Conclusion

• Check if the conclusion summarizes the main findings and their significance.
• Evaluate whether it provides clear recommendations for practice or further research.