Reviewer Guidelines

Thank you for agreeing to review for Partisipan: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat. Your insights are invaluable in maintaining the quality of our publication. Below are the guidelines to assist you in your review.

1. Presentation

  • Ensure the manuscript is well-organized and clearly presented.
  • Check for appropriate formatting according to the journal's guidelines.
  • Review any figures, tables, and images for clarity and relevance.

2. Writing

  • Assess the clarity, coherence, and readability of the writing.
  • Look for grammatical errors, typos, and inconsistencies in language.
  • Ensure that technical terms are defined and used consistently.

3. Length

  • Verify that the manuscript adheres to the specified word count limits.
  • Ensure that the length of each section is appropriate for the content presented.

4. Title

  • Evaluate whether the title accurately reflects the content and scope of the manuscript.
  • Check for conciseness and clarity in the title.

5. Abstract

  • Assess whether the abstract provides a concise summary of the research.
  • Ensure it includes the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions of the study.
  • Check for clarity and comprehensiveness within the specified word limit.

6. Introduction

  • Evaluate the clarity of the research question and objectives.
  • Ensure that the background context is relevant and adequately reviewed.
  • Check for the justification of the study and its significance.

7. Method

  • Assess the appropriateness and clarity of the research design and methodology.
  • Ensure that the methods are detailed enough for replication.
  • Evaluate any ethical considerations and approvals mentioned.

8. Result

  • Review the clarity and relevance of the results presented.
  • Check that data is accurately represented through figures and tables.
  • Ensure that results are reported without bias and appropriately interpreted.

9. Discussion

  • Assess whether the discussion interprets the results in the context of existing literature.
  • Check for acknowledgment of limitations and implications for future research.
  • Ensure that conclusions drawn are supported by the results.

10. Conclusion

  • Evaluate whether the conclusion succinctly summarizes the main findings.
  • Ensure it highlights the contributions to the field and potential applications.

Overall Evaluation

  • Provide a summary of your overall assessment of the manuscript, including strengths and areas for improvement.
  • Offer constructive feedback to help the authors enhance their work.