Reviewer Guidelines

Presentation

  • Manuscripts should be clearly organized and presented in a professional manner. Figures, tables, and illustrations should be appropriately labeled and referenced within the text.

Writing

  • The writing should be clear, concise, and free from grammatical errors. Reviewers should assess the clarity of expression and the flow of ideas throughout the manuscript.

Length

  • The recommended length for research articles is between 4,000 to 6,000 words, including references, tables, and figures. Reviewers should consider whether the manuscript adheres to this guideline.

Title

  • The title should be informative, concise, and reflective of the manuscript's content. Reviewers should evaluate whether the title effectively communicates the main focus of the research.

Abstract

  • The abstract should provide a brief summary of the study, including the research question, methodology, key findings, and implications. Reviewers should assess the clarity and completeness of the abstract.

Introduction

  • The introduction should clearly outline the research problem, objectives, and significance of the study. Reviewers should evaluate whether the background literature is adequately reviewed and whether the rationale for the study is well articulated.

Method

  • The methodology section should provide a detailed description of the research design, participants, instruments, and data analysis procedures. Reviewers should assess the appropriateness and rigor of the methods used.

Result

  • The results section should present the findings in a clear and logical manner, using appropriate statistical analyses if applicable. Reviewers should evaluate whether the results are clearly articulated and supported by the data.

Discussion

  • The discussion should interpret the results in the context of existing literature, highlighting the study's contributions to the field. Reviewers should assess the depth of analysis and the coherence of arguments presented.

Conclusion

  • The conclusion should summarize the key findings and their implications for practice, policy, or future research. Reviewers should evaluate whether the conclusion effectively encapsulates the study's contributions.