Peer Review Process

Jufils: Jurnal Filsafat dan Sains employs a closed double-blind review process to ensure the integrity, quality, and objectivity of the research published in the journal. In this system, both the identities of the authors and reviewers are kept anonymous throughout the review process. Upon submission, each manuscript is assigned to a minimum of two expert reviewers in the relevant field, who evaluate the work based on its originality, relevance, methodological rigor, and contribution to the field of philosophy and science.

Reviewers are encouraged to provide constructive feedback, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement. The editorial team carefully considers the reviewers' comments and recommendations when making publication decisions. Authors may be required to revise their manuscripts based on the feedback received and resubmit them for further evaluation.

This double-blind review process aims to eliminate potential biases related to authorship and to foster a more objective assessment of the work. By adhering to these standards, Jufils is committed to maintaining high scholarly standards and advancing the discourse at the intersection of philosophy and science.