Reviewer Guidelines

1. Presentation

  • Ensure the manuscript is well-organized and visually clear.
  • Check for appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and formatting.
  • Evaluate the overall presentation, including figures and tables, for clarity and relevance.

2. Writing

  • Assess the clarity and coherence of the writing.
  • Look for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and proper language usage.
  • Ensure the writing style is appropriate for an academic audience.

3. Length

  • Confirm that the manuscript adheres to the journal's length requirements.
  • Evaluate whether the length is justified by the content provided; too brief or excessively long submissions may require revision.

4. Title

  • Ensure the title accurately reflects the content and focus of the manuscript.
  • Assess whether the title is concise, engaging, and informative.

5. Abstract

  • Evaluate the abstract for clarity, completeness, and relevance.
  • Check that it summarizes the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions of the study.

6. Introduction

  • Assess whether the introduction provides sufficient background and context for the research.
  • Ensure that the research problem or question is clearly stated and justified.
  • Check for a clear outline of the study's objectives and significance.

7. Method

  • Evaluate the appropriateness and rigor of the research design and methods.
  • Ensure that the methods are described in sufficient detail for replication.
  • Assess whether ethical considerations are adequately addressed.

8. Result

  • Review the presentation of results for clarity and coherence.
  • Ensure that results are presented logically and supported by appropriate data.
  • Check for the inclusion of relevant tables and figures.

9. Discussion

  • Assess whether the discussion interprets the results accurately and relates them to the research question.
  • Evaluate the discussion of implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research.
  • Ensure that the discussion provides a critical analysis rather than mere restatement of results.

10. Conclusion

  • Confirm that the conclusion effectively summarizes the main findings and their relevance.
  • Assess whether it provides clear takeaways for practitioners or researchers in the field.
  • Ensure the conclusion does not introduce new information or ideas.