Reviewer Guidelines

As a reviewer for Integrasi: Jurnal Kesatuan Ilmu, your feedback is crucial in maintaining the quality of the journal. Please consider the following guidelines when evaluating manuscripts:

1. Presentation

  • Ensure that the manuscript is well-organized and follows the journal’s formatting guidelines.
  • Check that tables, figures, and illustrations are clear, properly labeled, and relevant to the content.

2. Writing

  • Assess the clarity and coherence of the writing. The language should be precise and appropriate for an academic audience.
  • Look for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and overall readability.

3. Length

  • Verify that the manuscript adheres to the journal’s specified word count limits.
  • Ensure that each section is adequately developed without unnecessary repetition or verbosity.

4. Title

  • Evaluate whether the title accurately reflects the content and focus of the manuscript.
  • It should be concise, informative, and engaging.

5. Abstract

  • Check that the abstract provides a clear summary of the research, including the purpose, methods, key findings, and implications.
  • It should be within the word limit and free of jargon.

6. Introduction

  • Assess whether the introduction presents the research problem clearly and provides adequate background information.
  • The objectives and significance of the study should be stated explicitly.

7. Method

  • Review the methodology for appropriateness and rigor. Ensure that the methods used are clearly described and reproducible.
  • Check for ethical considerations, including approvals and consent if applicable.

8. Result

  • Evaluate whether the results are presented clearly and logically.
  • Ensure that data is accurately reported and that tables and figures effectively support the text.

9. Discussion

  • Assess the interpretation of results in the context of existing literature. The discussion should address the implications, limitations, and potential future research directions.
  • Ensure that conclusions are justified based on the results.

10. Conclusion

  • Review whether the conclusion succinctly summarizes the key findings and their relevance.
  • It should avoid introducing new information and reflect on the broader implications of the study.