Peer Review Process
Integrasi: Jurnal Kesatuan Ilmu employs a closed double-blind review process to ensure the integrity and quality of the research published in the journal. In this process:
-
Anonymity: Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process. This approach minimizes bias and encourages impartial evaluations of the submitted manuscripts.
-
Reviewer Selection: Manuscripts are assigned to expert reviewers who are knowledgeable in the relevant field. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and ability to provide constructive feedback.
-
Review Criteria: Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on originality, significance, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field of integrated knowledge.
-
Feedback and Revision: Reviewers provide detailed feedback to authors, and authors are given the opportunity to address the comments and revise their manuscripts accordingly.
-
Final Decision: The editorial board considers the reviewers' feedback to make the final publication decision, ensuring that only high-quality research is published.
This peer review process aims to uphold the journal’s standards and promote the dissemination of credible and impactful research.