Peer Review Process

Every manuscript received by the editorial team will undergo an initial review process by the editor to ensure it aligns with the journal's focus and scope, as well as the completeness of the manuscript's administration. Manuscripts that meet the initial criteria will be forwarded to a blind peer review process by peer reviewers, who are experts in education and related issues. This review process assesses aspects of substance, novelty, scientific contribution, and technical aspects of the writing. After the review process, the manuscript will be returned to the author for revision based on the reviewers' input.

This process is estimated to take a maximum of one month. All manuscripts are thoroughly read and evaluated. Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's criteria may be rejected directly by the editor without external review. Manuscripts that are potentially of interest to readers will be sent to reviewers for blind review.

The final editorial decision is based on the reviewers' recommendations, with several possible outcomes: accept, accept with revisions, or reject. The editor has full discretion to decide which manuscripts are suitable for publication.

Review Process:

1. Author submits manuscript
2. Initial evaluation by editor (some manuscripts may be rejected or returned before review)
3. Blind peer review process
4. Editor's decision
5. Confirmation of review results with author