Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Invitation and Guidelines for CoSBelife: Community Service For Better Life

We are committed to elevating the quality of our journal, CoSBelife: Community Service For Better Life, and we are honored to invite esteemed experts to join our team of reviewers. Your expertise and insights are essential in ensuring the publication of high-caliber manuscripts.

Reviewer Qualifications:

• Possession of a Master's or Doctoral degree.
• Prior experience in reviewing for scientific journals is highly preferred.
• Proven track record of publishing articles in internationally recognized, cited journals.

Review Guidelines:

Reviewers are asked to consider the following criteria during their evaluations:

Presentation:

• Does the manuscript present a clear and compelling argument?
• Are the ideas expressed clearly and succinctly?

Writing:

• Does the title accurately reflect the content of the manuscript?
• Is the writing style clear and comprehensible?

Length:

• Identify sections of the manuscript that may need further elaboration, reduction, summarization, or consolidation.

Title:

• Does the title clearly, concisely, and engagingly represent the manuscript's content?

Abstract:

• Does the abstract include essential elements such as the research background, objectives, methods, findings, and implications?

Introduction:

• Does the background identify a research gap?
• Does the literature review incorporate relevant theories?
• Is the originality of the work highlighted?
• Are the study's objectives and hypothesis development clearly outlined, if applicable?

Method:

• Are all research procedures thoroughly described?
• Are the study variables, research subjects, and research instruments identified?
• Are data analysis techniques explained in detail?
• Is there enough information for other researchers to replicate the study?

Result:

• Are tables and figures used effectively to present processed data?
• Do the results address the research question and/or hypotheses?

Discussion:

• Are results analyzed in relation to existing literature?
• Are the implications of the research clearly described?
• Are the study's strengths and limitations discussed?

Conclusion:

• Are the main conclusions effectively summarized?
• Are findings presented as a synthesis of results and discussions?
• Are new findings that contribute to the development of community service highlighted?

Your adherence to these rigorous standards is vital in maintaining the excellence of CoSBelife: Community Service For Better Life. We value your dedication to advancing scholarly discourse in our multidisciplinary field.