Reviewer Guidelines
Thank you for agreeing to review for Manunggal: Journal of Collaboration for Community Welfare. Your detailed and constructive feedback is crucial in maintaining the quality and rigor of the journal. Please assess the manuscript based on the following criteria:
1. Presentation
Evaluate the overall presentation of the manuscript. Consider whether the layout, formatting, and structure are clear and professional. Is the manuscript easy to navigate and well-organized? Suggest any improvements in the presentation to enhance readability.
2. Writing
Assess the quality of writing, including grammar, clarity, and conciseness. Is the language clear and accessible to a broad audience? Are there any instances of vague, ambiguous, or overly technical language that should be simplified or clarified?
3. Length
Determine if the manuscript is appropriately concise or overly lengthy. Does the length suit the content presented? Are there sections that could be shortened or expanded for greater clarity or depth?
4. Title
Evaluate the title of the manuscript. Is it informative and representative of the content? Does it accurately reflect the key findings and scope of the paper? A good title should be clear, concise, and engaging for potential readers.
5. Abstract
Assess the abstract to ensure it provides a clear and concise summary of the research. Does the abstract effectively convey the objectives, methods, results, and significance of the study? Is it well-structured and informative enough to capture the essence of the paper?
6. Introduction
Review the introduction for its ability to set the context and rationale for the study. Does the introduction clearly explain the problem being addressed and the objectives of the research? Is the background literature relevant and sufficiently discussed?
7. Method
Examine the methodology used in the study. Is the research design sound and appropriate for addressing the research questions? Are the methods clearly explained and replicable? Evaluate whether the data collection and analysis techniques are valid and reliable.
8. Results
Consider the presentation of the results. Are the results clearly presented and supported by the data? Are the figures, tables, and other visuals helpful in understanding the findings? Check for any inconsistencies or gaps in the presentation of the results.
9. Discussion
Assess the discussion in terms of its ability to interpret the results in relation to the research questions and existing literature. Does the discussion offer meaningful insights into the implications of the findings? Are the limitations of the study acknowledged, and are they discussed appropriately?
10. Conclusion
Evaluate the conclusion for its effectiveness in summarizing the main findings and contributions of the study. Does the conclusion align with the evidence presented in the manuscript? Consider whether the conclusion offers useful recommendations or directions for future research or practice.