Peer Review Process

Jupawan: Jurnal Pancasila dan Wawasan Kebangsaan implements a closed double-blind peer review process to ensure the integrity and quality of published research. In this system, both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.

1. Submission: Authors submit their manuscripts through the journal's online submission system.
2. Initial Evaluation: The editorial team conducts an initial evaluation to ensure the manuscript aligns with the journal's focus and scope.
3. Reviewer Selection: The editorial team selects at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
4. Review Process: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, relevance, methodology, and clarity of presentation. They provide constructive feedback and recommendations for improvement.
5. Decision: After receiving the reviewers' comments, the editorial team makes a decision on the manuscript: acceptance, revision (major or minor), or rejection. Authors are notified of the decision along with the reviewers' comments.
6. Revisions: If revisions are requested, authors must address the feedback and resubmit the manuscript for further evaluation.
7. Final Decision: The editorial team makes a final decision based on the revised manuscript and the reviewers' assessments.

This double-blind process promotes objectivity and impartiality in the evaluation of submitted works, ensuring that all research published in Jupawan meets the highest academic standards.