Citra

Peer Review Process

Citra: Journal of Community Empowerment employs a closed double-blind review process to ensure the integrity and quality of the research published. In this system, both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process. Each submitted manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent experts in the field, who assess the work based on its originality, significance, methodology, and contribution to the field of community empowerment.

The objective of this process is to minimize bias and promote constructive feedback, ultimately leading to the enhancement of the quality of published articles. Authors are encouraged to revise their manuscripts based on the reviewers' comments, ensuring that the final published version meets the highest standards of academic rigor.